“Yet Gulf futurism offers no new imagery to displace the hegemonic ones in power—instead setting up the scaffolding to reproduce the injustices, structural degradation and racial erasures of the present. As ethnifuturisms go, it feels like there’s something missing, too. Where’s the longing, the displacement, the impossibility of return? Where’s the Afghan, the Filipino, the Indian, the Iranian, the Somali, the Pakistani, the Bangladeshi, the Iraqi, and all the other non-Khaleeji Arabs all bound up into one pathologised brown body? [Experimental jazz musician] Sun Ra had to go all the way to Saturn; the Gulf futurist doesn’t need to go anywhere because they’re welcomed, and even reified, right at home.”
via Scott Smith’s “chat” with Rahel Aima
“Practically every entity that Starlitz found of interest was involved in the Bosnian scene. UN. USA. NATO. European Union. Russian intelligence, Russia mafia (interlocking directorates there). Germans. Turks. Greeks. Ndrangheta. Camorra. Israelis. Saudis. Iranians. Moslem Brotherhood. An enormous gaggle of mercs. There was even a happening Serbian folk-metal scene where Serb chicks went gigging for hooting audiences of war criminals. It was cool the way the Yugoslav scene kept re-complicating. It was his kind of scene…Now it’s different. This time Russia has a kind of craziness that is truly big enough and bad enough to take over the whole world. Massive; total, institutional corruption: Top to bottom: Nothing held back. A new kind of absolute corruption that will sell anything: the flesh of our women, the future of our children. Everything inside our museums and our churches. Anything goes for money: gold, oil, arms, dope, nukes. We’ll sell the soil and the forests and the Russian sky. We’ll sell our souls.”
A strong novella, bringing back Bruce’s continuing character, Leggy Starlitz via RuLit
He describes a number of styles of exposition specific to Cyperpunk writing; from “crammed prose” to “eyeball kick” (borrowed from the Beats) to the “inventory of perception“.
h/t Beyond the Beyond
Louis Lucero II covers the event for the LA Times (here). In the interview Bruce Sterling had this to say:
“The thing that interests me about design fiction, which is a young and not yet very well-defined idea, is that on the Internet you can bring all kinds of things to the process of design that make a prototype look a lot more convincing than it used to be”
For more info visit MADe UP: MAKING UP EVENT which was billed thusly “Fiona Raby and Bruce Sterling, two of the world’s most influential voices at the intersection of fiction and design, will join MADE UP curator Tim Durfee to discuss tactical anachronisms, designing for ambiguous reality, and the re-emergence of speculative practice in the 21st century.”
Via Bruce Sterling’s Flickr stream I encountered this image, presumably with text by Dunne & Raby.
Critical Design the Dunne and Raby way
Additionally, see this image wherein Julian Bleecker makes the argument that Props Make the Future.
So I follow Bruce Sterling’s Flickr stream and have for a few years now. He is one of the few people whose photo-stream I follow that isn’t a close friend. I am definitely a fan of his writing. Both sci-fi books and essays etc online. Plus, he is a world traveler and visits cool art and cultural conferences, events, and gatherings. Anywho. Just recently he has been traveling in Brazil and while there visited the Instituto Cultural Imhotim.
One of the photos he uploaded was of a Rirkrit Tiravanija, project seen below.
And then I made a comment on it, and (here’s the exciting part) not only was I right in my guess, but he replied back. Eeeek! I mean I kind of just had a “conversation” with Bruce Sterling. See below, link here.
Anyways, silly and weird and definitely a result of all sorts of contemporary realities, both true and false.
Over at Boing Boing Guestblogger Chris Arkenberg (co-founder of Augmented Reality Development Camp, strategic adviser to Hukilau, and a visiting researcher at Institute for the Future) got in touch with Sterling and asked some questions about cities.
“Q-How do you think the psychogeography of the city might be affecting identity and tribalism? Do you suspect the trend is more towards collaboration or fragmentation?
A-That word “psychogeography” probably means something, but guys who use it go out on Situationist drifts and look for urban ley-lines. I do a lot of similar activity, but I don’t like to dignify it too much.”