re: the logisticalization of contemporary supply chains,

For No. 43 / Shelf Life of Harvard Design Magazine, Clare Lyster (author of ‘Learning from Logistics: How Networks Change Our Cities’) wrote Storage Flows: Logistics as Urban Choreography.

Wherein she argues

To fully comprehend contemporary mechanisms of flow, we need to explore the manner in which logistics shrewdly appropriates other external networks and spaces as a means to enhance its supply chain operations. For example, many logistical networks hijack familiar forms of urban infrastructure to further conquer the spatiotemporal gap between supply and demand. Piggybacking on other systems to optimize flow by collapsing supply and distribution into one seamless system has many implications for the city, changing how distribution typologies appear in the urban landscape and thus the landscape itself.

Note: There are a number of spots where I assume “ow”/”ows” should be read, as a typo, as “flows”…

Also, no surprise that Alan Berger comes up. I immediately thought of his writings on the infrastructural leftover spaces or dross. The spaces/places where “Storage flows” happen. Transit through.

What is different today, in particular is the role of algorithms and digital flows.

 

re: Landscape architecture, Indigeneity studies and Traditional Ecological Knowledge

Rod Barnett published an essay over at Places Journal. He begins with the observation

Indigeneity is scarcely mentioned in the field’s seminal texts nor discussed in its conference halls and online forums….My project investigates how indigenous communities are represented (or not) in this process of contemporary American landscape-making.

He then draws on the work of Brian Davis

who places the modern practice of landscape architecture within the ‘long, sophisticated tradition of landscape-making in the Americas,’ thus establishing continuity and dissolving the boundaries between us and them, then and now.

to make the case for transculturation, decolonization and an awareness of the indigenous experience as a continual contact zone, as guiding principles for Designing Indian Country.

On a related note, this recent piece by Annalee Newitz for Ars Technica digs into the medieval city of Cahokia. As I noted elsewhere, the piece led me to recall a great post (also by Brian Davis) from 2011 re: mounds as “precedent for responding to floods.” and a pre-Contact form of indigenous #infrastructuralurbanism.

these processes of concentration and extension, and the churning of use and habitation patterns

Back in 2014 Diffusive Architectures explained The fallacy of the ‘urban age’ and why

To properly see, understand, talk about, and strategise for urbanisation, we need new ways to describe and map these processes of concentration and extension, and the churning of use and habitation patterns. ..

Plus, Courtney Humphries argued that By making “urban” synonymous with “city,” we miss the realities of where we live (ie: the peri-urban or suburban) and how our sprawling ways are changing the world. In other words,

What’s very clear is that we need a language and a finer-grain differentiation of different types of urban life and urban ecosystems

‘A Tribe Called Red’ bring ‘We Are the Halluci Nation’ to Studio q

The discussion explores how/why/what’s next, in the span of the past few months, the conversation around Indigenous art and issues has come to the forefront of Canadian culture/politics.

Regarding the future of Canada, “Lets celebrate the next 150 years”

More via Q with Power via CBC Radio

re: “Unorganized Territory”

The NYT reports that in Maine, Local Control is becoming a Luxury, that fewer Towns can afford.

Resulting in a movement towards deorganizing and the growth of unincorporated areas, which exist in other states, but in Maine account for half of the land.

0117-web-mainemap-460

Source: State of Maine via NYT

Reminds me a bit of shrinkingcities project. While the scale is a bit different, the drivers (economic reorganization and depopulation amongst others), are shared.

Bug Hotels: A pedagogical act of Social design

I have been trying to get this written up for ages. For most anyone who could care, the re-emergence of the meme/idea of small-non-human architecture as urban intervention, will make this project old news. However, I really enjoyed doing it, especially the DIY/low-fi nature of it. I presented Bug Hotels: A pedagogical act of Social design at Pecha Kucha Gainesville Vol 4 held back in late June, 2012 at Volta Coffee and Tea. The raw, original presentation is viewable below via Slideshare.

Following the same model I used for presenting my first/previous Pecha Kucha post, I have also post each slide, individually below. Underneath each image a caption, culled from the text I used as my “speakers notes“.
So my project is a “Bug Hotel” but it is also about strategies of instruction. The goal of social design is instruction. Designing with and for social dynamics/relationships.
Bugs, hotel and pedagogy. This conceptual map is applied to examine the idea of productive vs generative urbanism(s)…
What is a bug hotel? I didn’t know either until winter of 2010. They are literally homes for bugs, but not a roach motel. Apparently, widely known in Europe. They can be functional and still serve as a lawn ornament.
Online examples of them used as a teaching tool for ecological learning. Pedagogical in nature but also a tool of garden enthusiasts encouraged for their ecological benefits.
There are also more hip examples. Here in London part of a creative class branding, green urbanism exercise. Not just your everyday DIY version, but CNC machined, Arup designed. Very British Hi-tech.
A resurgence of productive urbanism as next form of contemporary green urbanism. Urban farms, backyard and community gardens. Permaculture vs. post-industrial, a sort of re-Pastoralizing of the urban. A functional landscape, productive and post-industrial.
From urban food networks to other forms of urban metabolics. A making non-consuming urbanism. Looking at the image of hives, and thinking about modular scalability. Humans have long united insects and production. But can one also consider the axis of functionally productive vs generating function(ality)?
Scalability bridges the large and local scale. A wetland(s) machine is one recent attempt, for Paynes Prarie. One interesting aspect of that project is the suggestion of a teaching landscape. There will be an interpretive tower and experimental (read monitored/controlled) test cells. It was this eco-system vs an expensive retro-pipe.
Animal architecture, learning from animal building but building not just for animals. With ecosystems/ecologies… Habitat for bugs meaning ecological generation, an eco-logic.
Why are ecologies important? There is a self-importance but also because of services. The buzzword is “ecosystem services”.They can provide, distributed vs centralized, in big or small, built environment(s).
Urban garden/farming is creative. Growing, making but key is also generating. Can you virally, re-produce again? How?
Through social design, more than an object as result. Designing future designs but also designers.
Up-cycling vs recycling. Now come the specifics of the project. Salvage is one way. High end vs low cost and high-tech vs low-skills barrier.
Site is adjacent to a backyard garden. Grow Gainesville is a local network of like-minded urban agriculturalists. Another example of social design. Growing, agriculture.
Improvised. Used locally (read: yard) available materials. Bamboo.
Varied material size and habitat. Stacked construction, scalable and mobile. No nails, temporary.
A one man job. Easy and quick to do. Re-purposed some old windows in garage as roofs.
Had enough material for two. One short one tall. Repeatable.
What do we have? A DIY, scalable, ecological infrastructure. A science experiment, can be refined, personalized and spread.
Some final examples for inspiration. Manuals, for socially designed interventions. Wherein ecological infrastructure and feedback loops enable an ecological altruism of extra-species-sociality.
Finally, as a brief post-script of sorts, I want to highlight a wonderful “city science” project Native Buzz. Native Buzz is run by the University of Florida (IFAS) Honey Bee Research and Extension Lab. The “goal is to learn more about the nesting preferences, diversity and distribution of our native solitary bees and wasps, share the information gained and provide a forum for those interested in participating in the science and art of native beekeeping (and wasp-keeping!)”. The web-site features a crowd-sourced map component as well as DIY Building Plans.
Since, I no longer live at 835 Nw 20 St, I didn’t add my two “towers” to the list. Also, while I noticed insects, spiders, mice and other non-human animals inhabiting my yard and it’s structures, I did not notice many native bees. Likely because I didn’t target the habitat specifically to them.