re: “possibilities of an architecture without nature”

From David Ruy’s ‘Returning to (Strange) Objects‘ on object vs field , esoteric ‘relationism’, object-oriented ontology and craft.

Plus,

we may also want to investigate the possibilities of an architecture without nature…While thinking about this object-oriented ontology, it is fascinating to finally consider how the architect is to be understood…A return to the architectural object as a disciplinary priority…A return to the architectural object would move interest back to the thing itself. 

Also Karel Klein’s thoughts on ‘Smudge‘(s)(ing)(etc), and again David Ruy on ‘Weird Realism‘, subterfuge and utopianisms.

 

 

In above excerpt from a lecture they discuss “Knot Garden,” a proposal for PS1 Queens, NY; and “Klex,” their ongoing experiments with developing ornamentation through digital modeling.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s